Old Greek anarkia means "without any leader" (Dictionary by A. Bailly). From anarkia the word anarchy has derived = refusal to be ruled in any way how. As the word anarchy, however, has named political, fierce, sometimes murderous movements, while we aim at a spiritual achievement, I prefer to call it anarkia.

The Revelation of Arès says: You shall not be a leader for anybody (16/1), You shall not captain anybody (36/19). With these words the Father reminds us of the state of anarkia He gave His Children, the human beings when He created them, and he has ceaselessly recalled them to have to reestablish it.
Anarkia may recur, but it is a very difficult scheme, because it affects the sort of society Adam (Rev of Arès 2/1-5) wanted to set up: masses of ruled people subjected by the winds of a few rulers.
Can human beings be absolutely free (Rev of Arès 10/10) again, not be subjected to any ruler (16/1) or law (27/8, xix/24) after they have lived for millennia (at the very best) in freedom reduced by dominators even in democracies? The prospect of that revival explains why The Revelation of Arès is dismissed by powers, who think or claim that it is foolish to plan a comeback to an intelligent world for the basic humans chained to the wall of the cave that Plato made famous in "The Republic".
But human beings unknowingly have the tool to break their chain: love. Anarkia, which is a component of Good, will be reborn through love.

Anarkia is not anarchism.
Although anarchism is seldom mentioned in political speeches and by media, as if it had disappeared, anarchism continues to apply to many situations, albeit endlessly conquered, because it is nothing but the unlimited agony of anarkia ever since Adam's days. There will not be much of a future for anarchism, because it is incomplete by being forever looking for social, ethical, material freedom instead of the absolute bloom of the soul, therefore of love or Good.
It is not anarchism, but anarkia that we will bring to life for the sole reason that we are doing penitence (Rev of Arès 30/11) by reviving love, forgiveness, peace, spiritual  intelligence freed from prejudices. Anarkia or  the leaderless world (16/1) is in sync with the resurrectional plan of love of the neighbor.
In History there has been a wide spectrum of anarchism. Today we can see it for instance in the bulky nature of alterglobalization, the violent Black Blocks, the gentle Pink Blocks, the scary Revolutionary Clowns and others like the good old Anarchic Federation. There is not much of a future for all of them.

Anarkia issues from the soul, but not from the mind.
Anarkia is quite different from anarchism. Just as love will, it will conquer the terrible harmfulness of ego for the simple irresistible reason that ego is the only place into which man living under the iron rule of powers and their law can hide away from them, cut himself off from them, and because powers, once they have faded, ego as the current shelter of man will disappear and man's heart will open.

Anarchism in a lot of forms has striven to build a free society which could have been classless, unpatriotic,  borderless. It has striven to put up freedom, equality and security between all people without any law, power, police, judges or prisons. But it has rarely, shortly and only locally succeeded in doing so, because its purpose has been but social, ethical and material and unable to overcome the disproportion between the forces, as the powers' force has always been higher. Anarchism has forgotten about the strength of the spiritual, which is part to man.
It is wrong to think that anarchism is just just good at monkeying wrench and destoy; it has had strategies decided in participative, consensual, egalitarian debates, but they have continually been lacking in strength and just made sparks fly in unfinished actions and failed to kindle the only Fire (Rev of Arès xLi/5-7) likely to go.
There is not much of a future for anarchism, whatever form it may have.
Penitence, anarkia therefore, cannot work well but in small people units with no ruler or dominator, small units the public fonctions of which always revocable non-political managers are put in charge. Now, such a principle is only achieved if the links between men, which are currently knit together by law, get knit together by love. The community order which is hierarchical, policed, judicial, calendared, etc., which modern people think as innate and inevitable, is actually an ideology long grown unconscious and its opposite, which is anarchism, is an ideology likewise, although it has grown conscious because it has been constantly though vainly in search of existence.

Anarkia is not ideological, but fundamental :
Anarkia is the natural way of societal life, that the Father prompts us to recover, just as He prompts us to recover Life (Rev of Arès 24/5). Through The Revelation of Arès the Father reminds us of the crucial fact that we are creatures of a particular kind, creatures that are cocreators of themselves (the reminder of it has already been given by Genesis 1/26 : He made man in His image and likeness). He prompts us to prefer out theocreated form to our anthropocreated one, which is sinful and self-destructive, in other words to bridge the divide between the Creator and the cocreators, that is, bring down the devil (12/14) or get rid of Adam's sinful world (2/1-5, vii/6-14).
The rebirth of the Edenic world prior to Adam's Fall, the world that has formally vanished, but has remained virtually alive deep down inside man, will take time, but is achievable (Rev of Arès 24/2). What we call civilisation exists only because human beings are no more capable of meeting their real needs. Freedom as well as beauty and eternity represent natural life and as such as it will reappear on the Day when the Father stops the star under our feet and the Light ceaselessly covers everything and the universe jubilates (31/8-9), but we can be drawn to it as of now.
In no small part modern life is just imagination. Human beings live in castles in the air, are under illusions about lots of things, the emptiness of which some people (for instance, the Yellow Jackets) realize at times, cry it out, but are unheard. We know that modernity is deluding, because people continue undergoing time (Rev of Arès 12/6), worries, misfortune, hunger, fear, diseases and death. Anarkia as a plan of penitence will enable man to escape them; Just like love is, anarkia is a path to the Hights, the way to time when it stops (31/8), when man (whether we or our offspring) flouts the artificialities of so-called civilised life, when we satisfy our quest for Happiness, when we set ourselves free from the burden of what we call destiny.

Furthermore — to have to abridge my entry is irksome to me — anarkia is not just about powers and law whether political or religious. It is alike about saving humanity from other powers, those of cultures which model man on them, technologies which enslave him, many sufferings he cannot avoid. Anarkia is about man reconciling with his mankind, which he has come to hate — hence wars unremitting on earth, lawsuits (other forms of war), miscellaneous wrongs —  about man  breaking off ideologies, religions, psychosocial prospects, which have turned into infirmities. It is about eliminating giving man complete spiritual responsability in the magnificient community of the created Universe. It is about eliminating the shameless enthronement of powers like media stars, sport stars, fashions, sentinel issues that monopolize micros, television cameras, media, the litterature publicized in "book fairs" against the literature that is swept under the carpet to make it invisible or almost imperceptible. We can call power all that obscures the fact that all human beings are in equality makers of the world of Good that comes and the Father's equal Children.

Anarkia vanished long ago, but is there still a man on earth that could stop looking for its ghost at random? There is a main obstacle put on the way of anarkia like on the way of love:  Sin and the mistakes and shortcomings which result form it. Anarkia like love calls for the defeat of sin.
In Dostoievski's days anarchists used to say that there were three ways to prepare the change towards anarchism: 1. With undercover men like jesuits, 2. Through propaganda, 3. Through insubordination put into practice, but the three of them can be used at the same time." They were unseccesful. Today anarchists advocate, for instance, moves like "fluffy versus spiky", that is, the violent agaisnt the nonviolent. So Black Blocks are the spiky and Pink Blocks are the fluffy, but is there a noteworthy difference between them and the powers they fight? They too are unsuccessful, anyway. We Arès Pilgrims cannot pander to the violence of the spiky or the helplesness of the fluffly. We necessirily have to act in a different direction, to another form of leaderless world, one that will be spiritual.